GALAH Press Release on the Millennium Rally
GAY AND LESBIAN ATHEISTS
AND HUMANISTS
klem0@ibm.net
June 28, 1998
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact person: Tom Klem
Gay and Lesbian Atheists and Humanists Raises Objections to Millennium March, MCC
Sponsorship
Upon reflection and consideration of the issues involved, the Board of Directors of Gay
and Lesbian Atheists and Humanists (GALAH) has decided to express our organization's
strong objections regarding both the proposed "Millennium March" and the Metropolitan
Community Church's position as one of the two main sponsors. This proposed rally is
more than a year away, giving the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the Metropolitan
Community Church (MCC) plenty of time to recognize that it is inappropriate for a
religious group to be a main sponsor of such an event and that the concept of the rally is
severely flawed.
GALAH's Concerns About MCC Sponsorship
The leadership of the Human Rights Campaign has not been charged with designating the
chaplaincy of any national event. There are many groups in the community that style
themselves as "spiritual organizations," as does the MCC. They will likely participate in
any rally or march along with non-believers, the vast numbers of the religiously
indifferent, and partisans of myriad other religious and political causes. The MCC are not
our national spokespersons. We are not united by "spirituality": we are divided by it. The
MCC is a pariah church with its origins in the marginalization of sexual minorities by the
Christian sects.
Itemized concerns:
- MCC's presence as one of the two main sponsors of the proposed march is a violation
of Separation of Church and State. The experiences of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender communities make it clear how important it is for churches to stay out of
politics. Not only is state/church separation important for atheists and humanists, it is
vital to the prevention of persecution of minority sects, including the MCC.
- The presence of religion in politics is divisive in general, and this case is no exception.
Previous marches had some degree of dissention beforehand, but previous strife and
disagreements were far less frequent and far less heated than what is happening now.
- Another issue is the tax-exempt status of churches. Our movement should focus its
energies on creating pressure for the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of churches that
get involved in political activities, activities which are overwhelmingly homophobic, not
to encourage the largest lgbt-identified religious group to get involved in activities which
may violate its tax-exempt status. The recent retroactive loss of tax-exempt status by the
Christian Broadcasting Network shows that enforcement of tax laws against the political
activities of religious groups is a viable course of action.
- Having a religious group as one of the two main sponsors creates a less-than-friendly
atmosphere for non-Christians including Atheists, Agnostics, and Humanists.
- The homophobic nature of Christianity makes having a Christian church as a main
sponsor a tactical error. Having a "Christian" march will only remind homophobes of the
main reason why they think they should be hostile towards us and our civil rights. While
some in our community have tried to rationalize condemnations of homosexuality in the
Bible, the attempts have been based more on hope than reality. The fact that the
homophobic passages in the Bible are worded differently should make even the most
desperate queer Christian realize that the problem is not one of translation, but one of
prejudice within the original text.
- Through its sponsorship, the MCC has the power to push agendas which are not
consistent with the views and needs of the community as a whole. The most glaring
example is the theme of the rally, "Faith and Family," an attempt by the MCC to impose
religion on those of us who are atheists, agnostics, and humanists.
- The two largest religiously sponsored rallies in Washington, The Million Man March
and the Promise Keepers Rally, had limited impact after the events were over. If we want
to have any chance of all of the effort behind such a march to have a lasting effect, our
only hope is to keep it secular.
Concerns About "Millennium March"
The very conception of the rally is discriminatory to non-believers. The millennium has
Christian context based on the supposed date of Christ's birth. With any other calendar,
we would not be at the "Millennium." Also, the timing and form of a national event in
the coming years must not be determined and proclaimed by any single group or
pair of groups. Any organization which presumes to make so great a claim on community
resources also must be non-partisan and non-sectarian in its call.
Itemized concerns:
- The emphasis on faith and spirituality rather than diversity is a major problem. Not all
queers have any religious or spiritual beliefs whatsoever. The attempt to create the false
impression that most lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders place a strong emphasis
on religion in their lives flies in the face of the reality that most Americans, regardless of
sexual orientation, do not even attend church regularly.
- The "Millennium" in the name of the "Millennium March" is an unfortunate mistake
which can only fuel fundamentalist hysteria surrounding the year 2000. Much of the
grassroots fervor behind the Religious Right is based on end-of-world prophecies whose
timetables occur around the year 2000. We should do nothing to encourage any special
significance to the year 2000. Besides, no one will be marching because they are thrilled
with the year 2000. The word "Millennium" would be better replaced with words such as
"Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender" which would have the added benefit of bringing
this march out of the closet.
- Past marches were not proprietary events of two organizations. They belonged to the
community as a whole. In order to have a march that addresses the entire community, we
need a March Committee like past March Committees which were more broadly
representative. Besides, the HRC and MCC should not try to capitalize on the
tremendous efforts of people who put together past marches for their own gain.
GALAH hopes that the HRC and MCC will abandon their irrational approach and
support a secular and more broadly based march at a time agreed upon by a broad cross-
section of our community.
Do you know of other lesbian/trans/gay/bi organizations which are concerned about the Millennium Rally and have information about their views on their web pages? Let us know.
Let us know!
Go back to the issues page.
Go back to the main page.